web2.0

I hate twitter. Ever since I first heard about it; I thought it was the most pointless, self-obsessed, pathetic thing ever. Who has the time to constantly monitor this much information. It makes sense if you are following a terrorist, criminal or cheating spouse, maybe.

I have quite strong feelings on this because I have tried and failed to get it. I like my status updates on Facebook. It is one of the first things that I check when I go to the site. Now status updates are pretty much the same as twitter. So, I think the reason I don't get it is it needs to be integrated into something else: my mobile contact list.

And, for some reason I can never import my contact list from Gmail.

Jon

Anyway, I am trying twitter one last time under jmulvihill if you feel like enlightening me.

Found on Advertising 2.0

Blogged with Flock

Tags: , , , ,

The Yahoo design pattern library has been reorganized and updated with lots of new patterns. It is more than ever an invaluable resource for documenting rich interaction design. It is the first place that I go for information on interaction consistency and how to communicate these patterns to others.

Jon

Boo_logo After many years absence the infamous boo.com is back.  Cash in your web2.0 shares - the bubble identified by channel 4 only this week could be about to burst again!

Now a travel site, boo.com started out as a fashion "portal" with a unique feature - the mighty Miss Boo who was your guide through the land of fashion.

It didn't work, and they crashed and burned in style, burning through £160m in about a year and a half.  Good work!

Fully jumping into web2.0 the site features all the tell tale signs, with nice faded buttons and even a tag cloud on the home page.

Boocrash I would tell you what inside of it, but when I tried to sign up with the reg form it crashed.  So I can't get inside.

Not a great start!  Hopefully they'll fix that and I'll have a look later next week.

Howard
--

Goplan_blog_logo The team over at webreakstuff recently released goplan.

Goplan is a new entry into the online project management and collaboration sector, previously occupied by the likes of basecamp and eProject.

From their own site:
"Goplan is an online project management solution. It allows teams and individuals to collaborate through tasks, file management, real-time chat, online calendaring, and many other features."

Like basecamp, goplan features all the tools you'd expect in any new PM environment which appear to be as much about collaboration as charts and resource monitoring these days.

  • Project management
  • Task management
  • Online tracking
  • News letter publishing
  • Calendar (with iCal support - because no one uses outlook any more!)
  • IM
  • Access control
  • Safe file storage
  • SSL connections

Just signed up for an account, and choose the free option.  I don't have an opinion on how it works just yet, but something has grabbed my attention.  goplan has five different pricing structures ranging from free to $100 a month (ouch!).  With the free one, you get a VERY limited feature set and ads served into the interface to support the lack of subscription fee.

Regardless of whether anyone will click on an ad or not (i know I wouldn't) I think they're missing a trick by not releasing the whole feature set to the free account - this is where people are going to test drive this app, in the free account, and it seems odd to restrict these users to the minimal, although admitedly most important, feature set.  Why not release them all and put more ads into the interface?  If people find the product useful they'll soon be paying you $10 a month for a proper account and you'll have made a few quid from the adwords in the short term?

Howard
--


Henryrollins If this is true, and it is really him, then this is great!

Howard
--

Widget_example Widgets are big news. They're quite literally popping up everywhere and are even now being mentioned by people in the offline world, so they must have made it through to the masses (although apparently knowledge of what Skype is hasn't judging from a conversation I had yesterday!)

So, I thought it would be a good opportunity to write a list and brief explanation of the different Widget platforms out there.  I doubt I'll cover all of them, but i'll cover the ones that I personally know of and  use or have used.

For me, widgets break down into several different categories which are:

  • Application widgets
  • Operating System widgets
  • Web Desktop widgets
  • Embedded widgets
  • Mobile widgets

All of these do a very similar if not identical job to their various relatives, but the way they're distributed and in some ways engaged with can be different.

But what is a widget?
Before I go and start explaining the sub types, perhaps I should explain what a widget actually is?  Basicaly a widget is a small piece of software that you either download to your machine or add to your web page in order to fulfil a single very specific task.  Don't think of these widgets as software like MS Office or Adobe Photoshop because they're generally much more simplistic than those monsters.  Instead, think of them as small tools like a Flickr picture viewer, a BBC news reader or a radio station player.  The idea is that they are small, often visually appealing, single purpose tools designed to do one thing and one thing only.  Normally written using a combination of standard web langauges like HTML, JavaScript and CSS, widgets often come with a visual look and feel, including the GUI, that works on web principles also, and generally at the moment in a web2.0 style with fades and muted colours.  This means that they are very easy to use with zero learning curve.  The portable nature of widgets, and they're very small file size, also means they can be distributed with great ease.  As widgets generally don't require adminstrator access to install (certainly in the case of app or OS widgets) they're pretty much accessible by anyone who has the desire to use them. Examples of widgets could be:

  • an ebay search tool
  • a flickr photo viewer
  • a BBC RSS news reader
  • a calculator
  • a world clock

Application Widgets
Konfabulator_logo App widgets were the first ones that I came across, and I could be wrong, but I think they were the first ones to exist full stop.  The best known example of App widgets is called Konfabulator, and this is a widget "engine" for both mac and PC that you download, install and then run like you would any other application. You get a pre-defined set of widgets as standard and can download more from the gallery. This in turn enables the use of widgets on an operating system that would not normally have them. This was, I should add, pre MacOSX Tiger, which now has widgets built in, and as such was revolutionary when it was released.  Konfabulator comes with a default set of widgets, as do most other variants, and can be added to from a vast library of 1st and 3rd party widgets. 

Konfabulator was eventually purchased by Yahoo! and is now called the Yahoo! Widget Engine (Y!WE), with the company now supplying a default set of widgets which utilise predomiantly Yahoo! based web services out of the box. An update version of the engine, called Yahoo! Widgets 4, is due for release in the near future.

I personally don't see much of a future of Konfabulator/Y!WE now that Apple Mac OS X has Dhasboard built in, and WIndows VIsta has finally been released offering it's own built in tools.  This is a shame, as this really was a revolutionary product.  I could be wrong, but it seems a tall order for me when the two main OS's come with their own stuff included.  No doubt they're existing fan base, particularly on the PC, is loyal to the cause, but it must only be a matter of time.

Google_desktop_logo Google called their widgets Gadgets, and also have their own Widget engine, which comes as part of the Google Desktop, which is primarily an desktop search tool (and a VERY good one at that!).  Widgets are not turned on by default and you have to hunt around to turn them on.  Google widgets have a distinct look and feel (or certainly the default ones do) and IMHO aren't quite as attractive as some of the others.  I actually haven't used Google Widgets that much so can't comment on them a great deal.  Google widgets interestingly work on both your Google Desktop app and the Google personal desktop web implementation, available at google.com/ig. As with nearly all of these, there is a Gadget download area on the site.

Operating System Widgets
OS widgets are undoubtedly a progression on from App widgets and, in-particular, Konfabulator.  When Apple released Dashboard a few years ago, there were a lot of comments on how strikingly similar in look and feel it was to the (now) Yahoo! engine.  I think this is by the by and, in many ways, it's simply the nature of the beast for them to all look similar - they are all, after all, doing the same job to a degree and all word processors look the same.

Apple_logo On Apple Mac OS X Tiger and above, widgets are implemented through the Dashboard system, which is turned on by default for all users.  Users can download and install widgets from the Apple web site, and there are many of them available, provided by both Apple and 3rd parties.  Installing them is, as with most of these systems, simply the case of dropping them into a folder.  Widgets are not visible all the time (unless you hack them into dev mode) and are invoked by pressing the F12 key, turning the screen dark and bringing in the widgets over the top of all other applications.  As such, on a Mac, widgets are more of a "use it when you need it" implementation and they tend to lend themselves more to tools like a calculator, currency convertor and so forth, rather than toys or picture viewers.  These are available, this is just my own opinion.

Vista_logo Widgets (or as they call them, like Google, Gadgets) were introduced to the Windows world with the launch of Vista earlier this year (you can't have missed the WOW!) although, as mentioned with Y!WE, they were available before for XP if you knew where to look.  By default, widgets are turned off in Vista and are, when eventually turned on, implemented from first run in a sidebar area of the screen, imaginatively called Windows Side Bar.  Widgets can be dragged off the side bar and placed on the desktop itself, but this isn't the default setting.  Unlike Mac, Vista widgets are always on display and, for me at least, this means that more ambient widgets like a picture viewer or auction tracker are more useful.  Widgets are downloaded for VIsta from the MS LIve Gallery web site where there is a small but growing gallery of them, certainly not as large as the OS X one though.

Web "Desktop" Widgets
This name is a little clumsy but I can't think of a different one, so it'll do.  Web widgets are those which are implemented onto a customsable web page, which you would generally set as your home page in browser of choice.  All of the major search engines have their own implementation of these, and there is one notable start up player who has built up a massive following.  All of these implementations employ AJAX to provide the high levels of interaction and flexibility expected from widgets in a rigid browser based environment.

Google, Yahoo! and MS Live web based widgets
All of these monsters have their own widget enabled customisable start pages, and they're available free of charge if you have an account with them.  All of them feature widgets that are interchangeable with their OS or App version of the engine, MSN via Live! for Vista, Google and Yahoo! for Desktop and Y!WE accordingly.  Generally however, web based widget engines lead with a series of information driven widgets, predominantly RSS feeds and email readers.  They all employ a grid based page layout where you can drag and drop widgets into the space and order you find most appealing and useful.  There are rumours that for MS Live!/VIsta you can drag-and-drop widgets off the web page and onto the desktop, although I have seen no evidence or got this to work personally (although it's a really nice idea).

Netvibes
Netvibes_logo Netvibes is a French company who were one of the first to develop a customisable widget based web desktop, and I was introduced to them via Vincent, who I think has some strange sense of French loyalty with them.  Offering a default page which is amazingly busy, almost in an attempt to prove to new visitors just how many widgets you can have open with them at once, the site looks and feels very similar to the offerings from the search giants. This is probably because of two things.  (1) They all do the same job so why reinvent the wheel in terms of GUI and, (2), NetVibes was the first to do this.  NetVibes made a big announcment recently at the FOWA conference that they were moving into the development tools field, and recently released the NetVibes Universal Widget API, a set of tools to help widget developers create a build-once, deploy everywhere widget.  The system claims to cover off not only NetVibes itself, but also Dashboard, VIsta and others. As widgets are all pretty much built using HTML and JavaScript, this is a great idea, but I don't know why someone didn't think of it before.

For me, web based widgets simply do not work.  My main reason for using them would be as an information aggregation, and i have Sage/Firefox as my RSS reader to do this for me.  In terms of widgets for weather, ebay and so forth, I use Dashboard, so again, I have no need to a web based version.  I am sure one of the benefits of them is that you can use the same layout on any computer, but this isn't something that's important for me.

Embedded Widgets
Embedded widgets, known as many other things such as buttons, are small pieces of code, generally Flash based, that a user can embed into a pre-existing web page, such as a blog or myspace.  They aren't as flexible as something like the web based services, where positions can be moved and so forth, becuase they are limited to the abilities of the surrounding web site and not driven in a specifically widget-ready ajax site.

Popular examples of these widgets are MyBlogLog (a blog visitor tracking site), MeeboMe (a fantastic IM client and aggregator), Skype Buttons (a small, graphical display of your current Skype status and a direct link to contact you) and, of course, YouTube videos. 

All of the above are examples of widgetised tools that a user can stick on their own site as they see fit.  By turning something that was previously a OS level application (such as a video player) into a simple, single purpose flash based item, the audience and potential use for something grows nearly exponentially.

I have a particular fondness for embedded widgets myself, but Jonathan always tells me off for putting too many of them on the Adventures blog! :D

I personally think that from a digital marketing point of view embedded widgets are a great untapped (currently) place for us to discover and use and it's something I am actively looking to get going asap.

Mobile Widgets
Widsets_logo The only mobile widgets I am currently aware of are Widsets which is a Java application you download and install on your phone, and then effectively becomes a widget desktop.  All the usual widget suspects are here, RSS readers, weather reports, a clock, games and so forth - so it's nothing radical in terms of content.

What is good about widsets though is that, for me, it's the perfect realisation of the widget ideal in a space that dictates a dedicated approach and a concise delivery of information. 

In a close relationship with Nokia, Widsets is available for all phones with Java enabled, although there are some quirks in the interface (or at least there is on the blackberry 7103v) - but once you overcome these and work out it's little ways it is really a good execution.

As recent studies have stated that nearly 70% of mobile users shun advertising on their phones, the mobile widget space could be a way for us to get in front of mobile users by giving them a branded service they find real value in.

Howard
--

Splash3 Just a quick one on a friday night before we all go home/out/whatever...

The much talked about, especially at the FOWA conference a few weeks ago where it was first announced, NetVibes UWA (Universal Widget API) has now gone live and is available on this link.

Rumoured to be a single place for the creation of widgets that will work across all of the major platforms the official blurb says "our API becomes a powerful framework for Web widgets development - not only for Netvibes widgets, but also for many other environments, among which are Apple’s Dashboard and the Google Homepage".

Should make for some fun to look into over the weekend!

Full documentation is available here.

Howard
--

Jyte_logo Here's my current Jyte page with the claims I've made on it.  Like I said before, it's a good way to burn five mins of the day.

http://jyte.com/claims?by=howard.scott.myopenid.com

I guess London isn't the capital of the world then!  I wonder where is?

Howard
--

linkedin logo.gifI've been using LinkedIn for some time now, and whilst it is in some ways nothing more than yet another ego surf exercise, it does prove useful as an additional contact store and tool for getting back in touch with people on a par with both Plaxo and way better than Friends Reunited IMHO.

A few weeks ago they introduced a new service on top of the usual jobs and other stuff they already provide, called Answers.

Answers is a way for you to ask a question, not necessarily related to your professional area of expertise although it would make a lot of sense I am guessing, to your network of friends, their friends and so on. 

Basically, it allows me, for example, to ask 97 direct contacts, 2,600 secondary contacts and an overall network of 224,500+ people the following question: "When people from traditional marketing say "digital sucks" what do you use to back up your argument that it doesn't? Stats, data, examples?"

OK, so it's not the most eloquent of questions, but it's to the point.  This was inspired BTW by an email from a colleague at work who sent an email around questioning the effectiveness of digital and saying that it "isn't the silver bullet it's cracked up to be" (i've paraphrased this slightly!).

I decided to address this point directly, and after writing a long, blog like response, I deleted that and took the mickey.  :) Anyway, it inspired me to ask the network at LinkedIn and see what they say when this happens (and it happens more often than not working in integrated agencies - there are a lot of people out there who still fear the digital reaper) and see if i'd even get a few answers at all.

So, i've left it over the weekend, and what i've ended up with are six answers (one of which is a little weird and I suspect blog spam, but maybe i'm not reading it right?), which I'll reproduce below, and follow up in a post later on to see what I think of the service.  So, here are the answers to the question above...

Digital is cheaper and I pay the bill.  Show me that your plan provide us with better results...
Lodewijk Hof, Owner, Hof Holding


Well it is eminently easier to produce, design, test, adjust on the fly, cheaper, better stats, more easily targeted, quicker to 'mount' a campaign..... there are arguments a plenty here. It's also easier to, if not monitored and done right, waste a lot of money - so although it can be argued that digital works, in many ways, much better, it can go very badly wrong!

Chris Warrender, eBusiness Consultant; specialising in eCommerce, social media and online marketing and advertising.


Many of the consumers that clients are looking to engage with are leaving traditional media in droves and digital is the only place to reach them. My yardstick: clients trying to market to anyone within what is being called "Generation Me" (born 1970 or later) should include digital marketing and non-traditional marketing (including buzz, viral, etc.) in their campaign/marketing mix.  Unfortunately, we are in a transitional time where clients need to do both. Similar to the early days of the compact disc. Music labels had to provide both CD and cassette.

Bart Caylor, Principal, Owner, and Consultant at Brainstorm


Everything has its time and place. Digital doesn't suck...and traditional media isn't the end all be all. There are so many factors to consider...what are you selling? Who are you selling to? What is the purpose of your advertising?  As some of the other answers have stated...at this point in time you have to have a good mix...the right mix rather...in order to be successful. If you don't have a large budget, make sure you're getting an effective reach and frequency in your #1 medium before adding a second and third medium to your mix. Otherwise you'll just be too spread out.  I guess if someone told me digital sucks...I'd first laugh in their face and then I'd show them Google's stock quote.  Sorry I don't have better resources to turn you onto.

Scott Aderhold, Marketing and Media

(This is the weird one!) :) Remember those Star Trek episodes "Scotty, beam me up!" ?  We humans have always dreamed of "beaming" ourselves, objects or even travel in time. In fact, every morning I travel on the London Underground to work, I ask myself how the world would look like, if we could all be "beamed". But that's all science fiction - everybody would agree!  Not me. The world is currently coming apart. It divides itself in huge steps into what we would call the material and the virtual world. And absurdly while it splits into those two, somehow the borders between material and virtual world blur.  With virtual world I am not referring to Second Life, GTA, the Habbo Hotel or anything alike. The virtual world is the world where everybody is connected to each other and different mechanics and laws of physics play. The virtual world is the world of digital communication. The one on your e-mail client, on your iPod, your MSN Messenger, your Skype, your internet browser, your computer desktop or even your mobile phone.  And in the world of digital objects, "beaming", traveling in time (at least backwards), copying, replicating, distributing, referencing, linking, contextualizing, tracking, recording, remixing, archiving, searching, tagging, ordering, twisting and destroying is all too common.  That's because all can be wrapped in ones and zeroes. And there's a lot that you can do with ones and zeroes.
Christoph Burgdorfer, Telecommunications Consultant and Professional

I have coached our salespeople to not present it as better, but as way to target the clients campagin to a specific niche audience. I think trying to convince someone that digital is better is a philisophical argument that is to be avoided when dealing with a client.  I also tell the salespeople to encourage the client to develope a metric of how much a visit to their website is worth. That will force the client to look more deeply into their on-line presence. That analysis is good for them and good for us. It forces the client to look at their digital presence in a detailed way. They will ask us for help with the analysis which will deepen the relationship between client and us.
Murray Grevious, MIS Director at Creative Loafing

--
Howard